What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it's an "authority" that can ensure that the sender is the owner of the wallet address?
- Is "Signing Log-in" a way to prove that you are the wallet owner without posting a transaction on the chain, is that correct?
- Since the structure of wallet signing in TVM is safer than in EVM, as it is done on the browser level, funds in the wallet cannot be moved in any case. Is that correct?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it's an "authority" that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address?
- Since it is not an on-chain requirement, is that correct?
- Since the structure of wallet signing in TVM is safer compared to EVM because its wallet signing is at the browser level, it cannot move funds in the wallet in any case. Is that correct?
#signature
#wallet
#signing
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it's an "authority" that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address?
- Since it is not an on-chain requirement, is that correct?
- Since the structure of wallet signing in TVM is safer compared to EVM because its wallet signing is at the browser level, it cannot move funds in the wallet in any case. Is that correct?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it's an "authority" that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address?
Since it is not an on-chain requirement, is that correct?
Since the structure of wallet signing in TVM is safer compared to EVM because its wallet signing is at the browser level, it cannot move funds in the wallet in any case. Is that correct?
#signature
#wallet
#signing
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it's an "authority" that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address?
Since it is not an on-chain requirement, is that correct?
Since the structure of wallet signing in TVM is safer compared to EVM because its wallet signing is at the browser level, it cannot move funds in the wallet in any case. Is that correct?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?
#signature
#wallet
#signing
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?
What does TonKeeper signing represent? Can we say it is an 'authority' that can ensure the sender is the owner of the wallet address? And is it not a requirement on-chain?