Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escape special characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ - e.g. \+ \* \!
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Back to post

Revisions 6

10 months ago
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
FunC exists since the very beginning of TON, and Tact 1.0 was released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment, and it's natural there are not many tutorials yet. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But for the learning purposes you can already freely use Tact. One of its goals is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
FunC exists since the very beginning of TON, and Tact 1.0 was released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment, and it's natural there are not many tutorials yet. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. One of the goals of Tact is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
10 months ago
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
FunC exists since the very beginning of TON, and Tact 1.0 was released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment, and it's natural there are not many tutorials yet. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. One of the goals of Tact is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
FunC exists since the very beginning of TON, and Tact 1.0 was just released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment, and it's natural there are not many tutorials yet. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. One of the goals of Tact is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
10 months ago
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
FunC exists since the very beginning of TON, and Tact 1.0 was just released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment, and it's natural there are not many tutorials yet. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. One of the goals of Tact is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
FunC exists from the very beginning of TON, and Tact 1.0 was just released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment, and it's natural there are not many tutorials yet. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. One of the goals of Tact is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
10 months ago
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
FunC exists from the very beginning of TON, and Tact 1.0 was just released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment, and it's natural there are not many tutorials yet. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. One of the goals of Tact is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
FunC is a part of the TON ecosystem from the very beginning, and Tact 1.0 was just released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. One of the goals of Tact is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
10 months ago
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?
FunC is a part of the TON ecosystem from the very beginning, and Tact 1.0 was just released in March 2023 (less than two month ago), so it's just very new at the moment. Speaking of the limitations: currently Tact is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC (or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to). But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. One of the goals of Tact is to lower the entry barrier for newcomers to TON, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
FunC is present in the TON ecosystem from the very beginning, and Tact 1.0 was released in March 2023 (less than two month ago at the time of writing), so it's just very new at the moment. Speaking of the limitations: currently it is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to. But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. Its purpose is to lower the entry barrier, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).
10 months ago
Original
Why there's much less info on Tact than FunC?

FunC is present in the TON ecosystem from the very beginning, and Tact 1.0 was released in March 2023 (less than two month ago at the time of writing), so it's just very new at the moment. Speaking of the limitations: currently it is still undergoing reviews and security audits, so if you are developing something that holds a lot of money, for the time being it might be better to use FunC or to use Tact and then audit the FunC code that Tact compiles to. But if you are just learning, you can freely use Tact right now. Its purpose is to lower the entry barrier, so it might be easier for you to use it than FunC (although that depends on your previous background). And if you need learning material, I suggest the website [tact-by-example.org](https://tact-by-example.org).